Legal Opinion

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION v. FRANCHITTI

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2022No. 3:21-cv-16937Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY Civil Action No. SOLUTIONS and COGNIZANT 3:21-cv-16937 (PGS)(RLS) TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS USS. CORPORATION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs, V. JEAN-CLAUDE FRANCHITTI and VARTAN PIROUMIAM, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on two motions: (1) Defendant Vartan Piroumiam’s (“Piroumiam”) Motion to Dismiss under the “‘first filed” rule and under Rule 12(b)(6), (ECF No. 3); and (2) Defendant Jean-Claude Franchitti’s (“Franchitti”) Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, (ECF…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API