Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberto Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 2, 1987No. 86-2093PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Roberto Rodriguez, was indicted with thirty-one co-defendants and, after a separate trial, found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine, possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, and using a telephone to facilitate the conspiracy. Rodriguez appeals the verdict on three grounds: (1) the fourth amendment requires the exclusion of evidence obtained when state police stopped Rodriguez’s car without articulable suspicion; (2) insufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict of guilty of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute; and (3)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Kevin R. Smith, Dalian C. Stewart, and Steve TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. James GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API