Legal Opinion
Loveless v. Diehl
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 3, 1962No. 5-2841PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
Appellees, W. A. Diehl and wife, filed suit against Appellants, J. E. Loveless and wife, for specific performance of an option contract, and in the alternative prayed for damages. Appellants, Loveless and wife, denied the claim for specific performance; and, by counterclaim, sought judgment on a note. Trial in the Chancery Court resulted in a decree awarding Diehl and wife specific performance and damages ; and also awarding Loveless judgment on the note. Both sides have appealed.
Mr. and Mrs. Loveless owned a farm of 79 acres in Faulkner County; and they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jamison Coal & Coke Co. v. GoltraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Read's Drug Store v. Hessig-Ellis Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Sims v. BestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Cole v. SalyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. CreelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Bharodia v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoacheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Justus v. ClellandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.