Legal Opinion

Bowie v. Maddox

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action No. 03-948 (RCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for judgment as a matter of law [124] or, in the alternative for a new trial [125]. Upon consideration of the motion, defendants’ opposition, the reply, the entire record herein, and applicable law, the Court will DENY plaintiffs motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff David M. Bowie was employed as the Assistant Inspector General for Investigations (“AIGI”) for the District of Columbia Office of Inspector General (“DCOIG”) from November 1997 until his termination in August 2002. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. Cones, Kenneth L. v. Shalala, Donna E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Carney, Darion M. v. Amer UnivCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowie v. MaddoxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Banks v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Czekalski v. Secretary of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. McNamara v. PickenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API