Roth v. National Automobile Mutual Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Greenbaum, J.:
The action is brought against the defendant to recover the amount of a judgment obtained by the plaintiff against one Ignatz Friedman, arising from injuries alleged to have been sustained by her and occasioned by the negligence of his chauffeur in driving his automobile. At the time of the accident Friedman held a policy of insurance in the defendant company, which insured him against loss by reason of any liability attaching to him in the operation of the automobile in question.
The defendant’s answer alleges that subsequent to the accident Friedman “ violated and breached the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by33 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- 175 East 74th Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.