Legal Opinion
Wheeling Terminal Ry. Co. v. Russell
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1913No. 1,144PublishedCited by 8 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling; Alston G. Dayton, Judge. Action by Samuel J. T. Russell against the Wheeling Terminal Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
[1] Section 2 of rule 10 of this court (193 Fed. vii, 112 C. C. A. vii) directs that:
“Only so much, of the evidence shall he embraced in a bill of exceptions as may be necessary to present clearly the questions of law involved in the rulings to which, exceptions are reserved and such evidence as is embraced therein shall be set forth in condensed and- narrative form, save as a proper understanding of the questions presented may require that parts of it be set forth otherwise.”
In this case the entire - transcript of the stenographer’s trial notes has been included in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yangtsze Rapid S. S. Co. v. Deutsch-Asiatische BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Geraghty v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Rush v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- McAdoo v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Oregon-American Lumber Co. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.