Legal Opinion

McAdoo v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1919No. 1004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; Ballard Coldwell, Judge. Suit by Neva M. McCoy, administratrix, against W. G. McAdoo and his successor, Walker D. Hines, Directors General of Railroads.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Neva M. McCoy, the surviving wife of Buford McCoy, deceased, and ad- ministratrix of his estate, brought this suit against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company, the Rio Grande, El Paso & Santa Fé Railroad Company, W. G. Mc-Adoo and his successor, Walker D. Hines, Directors General of Railroads,' to recover damages resulting from the death of Buford McCoy.

Upon trial a 'peremptory instruction was given to find in favor of the two railroad companies. Verdict was returned and judgment so rendered.' As to the other defendants the issues were submitted to the jury and found in favor of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Hood v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Producers & Refiners Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API