Legal Opinion
Case v. Paul Troester Maschinenfabrik
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 6:98-cv-06545PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On January 8, 1998, plaintiff George Case (“plaintiff’ or “Case”), a sheeter operator at Garlock, Inc., suffered injuries when his right arm became entangled in a Model KD-IT-45/15 calender machine 1 that he was operating during the course of his employment. Troester Maschinenbau GmbH & Co. (“TMG”), a German partner ship, manufactured the machine in question in 1982. George Case and his wife, Anna Case (collectively “plaintiffs”), commenced the present action, against defendants Paul Troester Maschinenfabrik (“PTM”), another German…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Tabor v. Metal Ware Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006