Legal Opinion

Mary Pustelak, et al. v. Comerica Bank

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-10659Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARY PUSTELAK, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-10659 v. Honorable Robert J. White COMERICA BANK, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS This case involves Plaintiffs’ class-action claims arising from their participation in Defendant’s Direct Express Debit Mastercard program, which allows recipients of federal benefits to receive and spend benefits via prepaid debit cards.1 Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, statutory and common-law conversion,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API