Legal Opinion

Aldridge v. First Nat. Bk.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1932No. 30012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellants exhibited an original bill against the appellee, a national bank having its domicile and principal place of business in Birmingham, Alabama, alleging, in substance, that the bank had agreed to sell to- the complainants certain described land situated within the territorial jurisdiction of the court; that although the complainants stood ready, and had offered to comply with their part of the contract of sale, the bank refused to' sell them the land, but, on the contrary, had sold a part thereof, making it impossible for the contract to be specifically performed, resulting in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Boswell's Lessee v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mansour v. Charmax Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fletcher v. Limeco Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hoff v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. First Nat. Bank v. Mississippi Cottonseed Products Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Price v. McBeathCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API