Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1963No. 305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmáN, J.

The only question presented by the appeal is this: In which class, A or C, do the named legatees fall for the -purpose of determining the rate of tax to- be paid on the properties they received under Mrs. Minishls will?

The answer as to. be found by an interpretation and application of the appropriate statutes, G.S. 105-2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 to tire admitted facts.

G.S. 105-4, iso far as here pertinent, reads: “ (a) Where the person . . .' entitled to any 'beneficial interest in such property shall be the lineal issue, or lineal ancestor, or 'husband or wife of the person who died…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Great American Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Thomas v. BarnhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API