Ingram v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmáN, J.
The only question presented by the appeal is this: In which class, A or C, do the named legatees fall for the -purpose of determining the rate of tax to- be paid on the properties they received under Mrs. Minishls will?
The answer as to. be found by an interpretation and application of the appropriate statutes, G.S. 105-2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 to tire admitted facts.
G.S. 105-4, iso far as here pertinent, reads: “ (a) Where the person . . .' entitled to any 'beneficial interest in such property shall be the lineal issue, or lineal ancestor, or 'husband or wife of the person who died…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Great American Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Thomas v. BarnhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009