Boltuch v. Rainaud
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The principal question in this case may be stated as follows: Must notice of the pend-ency of an application or motion to vacate, modify or correct an arbitration award under General Statutes, §§ 8161-8163, inclusive, be given the adverse parties within thirty days of the notice of the award? It is raised by various dilatory pleas filed by the defendants and depends for its answer on facts of record, which appear in part in the case of Rainaud v. Boltuch (Superior Court, New Haven County, No. 72782), of which we take judicial notice. These are summarized as follows: On March 22, 1949, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Carbone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ackerman v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Fortune v. KillebrewTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Fishman v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Winick v. WinickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Skidmore, Owings Merrill v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins.Connecticut Superior Court · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.