Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Hoffman
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChahplin, J.
Plaintiff brought ejectment to recover possession of land described as follows:
“A portion of the south-east fractional quarter of section twenty-eight (28), in town (7) north, range seventeen (17) east, and bounded as follows: Commencing at á point where the south line of said section intersects the bank of Black river; thence east, on the south line of the said section, seventy-nine and one-half (79j-) rods; thence, forty-three degrees and twenty-seven minutes (13° 27 min.) west, to the bank of Black river; thence south-westerly, along the bank of Black river, up stream, to the place of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lessee of William L. Brown and Wife, in Error v. Joseph Clements and Jonathan Hunt, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Gazzam v. Lessee of PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Wilson v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co. v. South Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- First Nat. Bank of Decatur, Neb. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Chicago Lumbering Co. v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Nichols v. New England Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.