Legal Opinion

Nichols v. New England Furniture Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Argued March 7, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Plaintiffs, the widow and children of Isaac H. Nichols, bring ejectment to recover the premises lying between the north line of lot E, extended, the, south line of lot G, extended, the center line of the canal, and the east line of Mill street, as shown on the sketch on next page; the defendant having constructed a building on piles, over the canal on said premises.

Defendant claims title to the premises in question from two sources: (1) That, by conveyance of lots E and G according to the plat, it has the title in fee to Mill street, and to the center of the canal, as part and parcel of lots.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Board of Trustees v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Ryan v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Owen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Croucher v. WoosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Curran v. Maple Island Resort Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Lindsay v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Dubay v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API