Legal Opinion
Diamond v. Marland
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided May 28, 1975No. CV474-40PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS OF THE PARTIES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWRENCE, Chief Judge.
I
The Litigation
In this action brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 Herman Diamond seeks damages against the defendants, Sergeant Horace Case and Officer Mike Argust of the Chatham County Police' force and Dr. Frederick C. Marland and Rangers E. D. Maxwell and R. M. Cassidy who are employed by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Originally, the members of the Chatham County Commission were also parties defendant in the action but were eliminated as a result of the grant of their motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arthur Knight v. Jacobson, Officer, Badge 3359, IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Fialkowski v. ShappDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. BlairDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- McQurter v. City of Atlanta, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.