Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Midfirst

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 6, 2023No. Misc. No. 2023-0027Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BRYAN BRIGGS, et al., ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Miscellaneous Action 23-mc-0027 (TSC) ) MIDFIRST, et al., ) ) ) Respondents. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Petitioner Brett Jones, also known as “Eeon,” filed this miscellaneous action purportedly on behalf of Bryan “Briggs, et al, and Eeon et al,” against two named Respondents and “Doe’s 1-20, et al.” See Pet. to Enforce at 3–4, ECF No. 1. For the reasons set forth below, the court will dismiss this action sua sponte without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND The nature of Jones’s claims is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  4. Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  5. Sharon Rollins v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API