Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Company v. Kenneth D. Steinemer, James A. Pattison

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 1984No. 83-3055PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment to appellee, Allstate Insurance Co. (Allstate), on the ground that the conduct of Allstate’s insured, Kenneth Steinemer, which led to appellant’s, James Patti-son’s, injury, was intentional and thus excluded from coverage under the Allstate homeowner’s policy. We hold that the district court erred, and therefore we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action brought by Allstate in the United States District Court for the Middle District of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SpreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Butler v. BehaegheColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Phoenix Insurance Company v. HeltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Physicians Insurance v. SwansonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zordan v. PageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TroelstrupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Allstate Insurance v. McCranieDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API