Legal Opinion

Halladay v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A168497Published

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*1041*641At issue in this administrative rule review proceeding under ORS 183.400 are sections (2) and (3) of OAR 255-060-0012. That rule governs the use of psychological and psychiatric reports by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision in determining whether to affirm or defer an inmate's parole release date. Petitioner contends that the challenged provisions are invalid on their face, arguing that section (2) is contrary to ORS 144.125, and that section (3) offends the state and federal constitutional prohibitions on ex post facto laws. We agree and, for that reason, hold OAR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API