Krug v. Meehan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this action seeking a decree setting aside a conveyance of realty on the ground it had been procured by undue influence. A demurrer of defendant Rose A. Meehan was sustained to the complaint and to an amended complaint. With her demurrer to the complaint defendant Rose A. Meehan filed a cross-complaint seeking a decree quieting title to the realty in her. Plaintiff answered the cross-complaint. The demurrer of Rose A. Meehan was also sustained to a second amended complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not amend within the time allowed and, on motion of Rose…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gwinn v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tsarnas v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. Westlake Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Epley v. CalifroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.