Legal Opinion

Sheehan Construction Co. v. Dudley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 26, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a writ of entry to recover possession of a parcel of land in Wakefield. The plea of the tenant is in effect nul disseisin. There was a trial before a judge of the Land Court, who filed a “Decision” concluding with an order that judgment must be entered for the demandant for possession and damages. The tenant appealed from this decision. The demandant filed in this court a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that under the governing statutes and practice appeal does not lie, and that the only remedy open to the tenant was by a bill of exceptions.

“Questions of law arising in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Bessey v. OllmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Holmes v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. McCarthy v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Morganelli v. Building Inspector of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Pequod Realty Corp. v. JeffriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API