Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blair

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1979No. 12458Published

1DissentZastrow, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I would affirm the decision of Judge Braithwaite and hold that entry into a business place during the time it is open to the public cannot be the basis for a burglary charge. See State v. Taylor, 17 Or.App. 499, 522 P.2d 499; State v. Rogers, 83 N.M. 676, 496 P.2d 169; People v. Carstensen, 161 Colo. 249, 420 P.2d 820; Smith v. State, Alaska, 362 P.2d 1071; People v. Jones. 50 A.D.2d 750, 376 N.Y.S.2d 155.

The interpretation by the majority will make a first degree burglary charge possible for anyone who enters or remains in an occupied business place after sunset and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. State v. RogersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API