State v. Blair
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentZastrow, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
I would affirm the decision of Judge Braithwaite and hold that entry into a business place during the time it is open to the public cannot be the basis for a burglary charge. See State v. Taylor, 17 Or.App. 499, 522 P.2d 499; State v. Rogers, 83 N.M. 676, 496 P.2d 169; People v. Carstensen, 161 Colo. 249, 420 P.2d 820; Smith v. State, Alaska, 362 P.2d 1071; People v. Jones. 50 A.D.2d 750, 376 N.Y.S.2d 155.
The interpretation by the majority will make a first degree burglary charge possible for anyone who enters or remains in an occupied business place after sunset and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- State v. RogersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975