Smith v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
The question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain convictions of burglary as to each of the appellants, Anaruma and Smith.
The state’s principal witness was Jack Sexton, an employee of an automotive parts store, the Airport Machinery Company. Late one night, according to his testimony, he visited the Pink Garter, a so-called "night club” near the city of Anchorage, and proceeded to drink a considerable quantity of alcohol. When he reached the point of near insensibility, he claimed that someone at the club inveigled him into signing several checks. Later…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. BrittainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. BullIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. CorralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- McCreary v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. LozierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Mead v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.