Novak v. Chicago Fraternal Life Ass'n
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This is an action on a life-insurance policy. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
*610Mike Novak at the time of his death was a member of appellant-association. William and Joseph Novak were beneficiaries. This action is brought to collect on the policy.
Mike Novak stated in his application for insurance that he was born October 8, 1872; that he had never had disease of the heart, bladder or liver, diabetes or palpitation of the heart, but had had only “influenza 6 weeks, March, 1928. Complete recovery.”
On the day the case was called for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- McConnell v. City of OsageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Armstrong v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Templeton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Flaherty v. CNH Industrial AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- Templeton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936