Legal Opinion

Novak v. Chicago Fraternal Life Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1932No. 31,030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action on a life-insurance policy. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

*610Mike Novak at the time of his death was a member of appellant-association. William and Joseph Novak were beneficiaries. This action is brought to collect on the policy.

Mike Novak stated in his application for insurance that he was born October 8, 1872; that he had never had disease of the heart, bladder or liver, diabetes or palpitation of the heart, but had had only “influenza 6 weeks, March, 1928. Complete recovery.”

On the day the case was called for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McConnell v. City of OsageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Armstrong v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Flaherty v. CNH Industrial AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  3. Templeton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API