Legal Opinion

Summers v. County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants appeal and plaintiffs cross-appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint asserts 11 causes of action, all of which arise from plaintiff Summers’ employment at the Monroe County Human Relations Commission. Defendants’ motion was to dismiss the complaint, and plaintiffs’ cross motion requested leave to file a late notice of claim and to replead.

There are at least three claims in plaintiffs’ first cause of action asserted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Mills v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Picciano v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Neufeld v. NeufeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Finley v. GiacobbeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Foley v. Mobil Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Wolff v. City of New York Financial Services AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API