Legal Opinion
United States v. Estate of Claude Beresford Pearce
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 31, 1974No. 73-1012PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue with which we deal here is: is the denial of a motion to quash a sequestration order (issued in accordance with 10 Del.C. § 3661) appealable *848under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 2 as an appeal of a “final order” ? We hold that an order denying such relief is not final and accordingly dismiss the appeal and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
I
Litigation giving rise to this appeal commenced with a complaint filed by the United States (Plaintiff-Appellee) seeking among other relief a judgment against the Estate of Pearce:(a) for unpaid…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McCreary Tire & Rubber Company v. Ceat S.P.A. v. Mellon Bank, N.A. GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Bachowski v. UseryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Ed Miniat, Inc. v. Globe Life Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Cromaglass Corporation, Williamsport, Pa. (A Pennsylvania Corporation) v. Carl FermCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Hattersley v. BolltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.