Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1919No. Appeal, No. 71PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 71, Jan. T., 1919, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1915, No. 2632, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Catharine C. Sweatman v. Pennsylvania R. B. Company. Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Rogers, J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for |3,500. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in discharging defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The deceased was employed as a foreman in charge of riveters by Gibbs & Hill, contractors, who were engaged by the appellant to construct its electrification system on its main line from Broad Street Station to Paoli. The work of the contractors as it related to the foreman’s duties was located between Eighteenth and Twentieth streets and consisted in the building of foundations for signal towers. The railroad between Broad and Twentieth streets is elevated and the foundations were outside the line of the elevated structures and below the level of the tracks. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zandt v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kasanovich v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Bardis v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Copertino v. ChrobakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Neal v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Richards v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API