Legal Opinion

Ames Department Stores, Inc. v. Assessor of Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and respondents’ motion denied. Memorandum. Petitioner asserts that it was error for Trial Term to grant respondents’ motion to dismiss its action under Real Property Tax Law article 7 on the grounds that petitioner does not have legal capacity to bring the action and that the petition was not properly verified. We agree. Because petitioner is responsible under its lease for taxes on the leased premises, it is an "aggrieved person” under Real Property Tax Law article 7 (Matter of Ames Dept. Stores v Assessor of Town of Concord, 102 AD2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ames Department Stores v. Assessor of Town of ConcordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Extrom v. Town of SkaneatelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schachter v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API