Legal Opinion
Extrom v. Town of Skaneateles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 4, 1985No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, respondents’ motion denied and petitioners’ cross motion granted. Memorandum: The failures to provide and to attach to the petition written authorizations designating the board of managers of the condominium to act as agent for the unit owners as required by Real Property Law § 339-y(4) and Real Property Tax Law § 706(2) are not jurisdictional defects, but irregularities that were waived by the failure of the town to give prompt notice of those objections (see, Matter of Ames Dept. Stores v Assessor of Town of Concord, 102 AD2d 9,13; Bergman v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ames Department Stores v. Assessor of Town of ConcordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- City of Little Falls v. Board of Assessors of SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People ex rel. Greenwood v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Bergman v. HorneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ames Department Stores, Inc. v. Assessor of EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Barron v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998