Mayo v. Mayo
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of her motion for directed verdict and its finding that defendant was not legally married to Danny Lee Mayo. Before determining whether the trial court’s denial of the motion was correct, we must examine the procedural aspect of defendant’s motion.
Directed verdicts are appropriate only in jury cases. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50; Bryant v. Kelly, 279 N.C. 123, 181 S.E. 2d 438 (1971). This case was tried without a jury. In nonjury civil cases the appropriate motion by which a defendant may test the sufficiency of the plaintiffs evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Denson v. CR Fish Grading Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nix v. NixCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Mashburn v. First Investors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- O'Herron v. JersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Estate of Hanner v. HannerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.