Legal Opinion

Rappaport v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1940No. Civ. 12598PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

A writ of review having been issued, this matter is now before us for decision as to whether or not the respondent court exceeded its jurisdiction in making the two orders by which petitioner is aggrieved.

Petitioner is an official court reporter of respondent court. Prior to the 19th day of April, 1938, department 12 of said court had for 59 days conducted a trial of the action of Will iams v. Davis. Petitioner reported 52 days of said proceedings. From the judgment entered in favor of the defendant Davis, plaintiff took an appeal by the alternative method. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953a.) On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Fuller v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Homan v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re PillsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re RisnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. McCormick v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dowell Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. v. Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API