Legal Opinion

Dowell Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. v. Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1988No. 19393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

This is an appeal by the defendant Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc. (“Del Rio”), from a judgment denying Del-Rio recovery on a counterclaim for damages to its oil well. A jury found that both the plaintiff, Dowell Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. (“Dowell”), and the defendant were negligent in performing fracturing operations on the defendant’s oil well. The jury also found that neither party’s negligence was the proximate cause of Del-Rio’s loss of production from the well. We affirm.

I. Facts

During 1980, Dowell supplied materials and services to Del-Rio for the operation of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bennion v. LeGrand Johnson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Moore v. Burton Lumber & Hardware Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Watsabaugh & Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. American Oil Co. v. Columbia Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JH BY DH v. West Valley CityUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Graves v. No. E. Services Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Butterfield v. OkuboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API