Legal Opinion

Cooter v. Baston

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9931PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellees’ complaint alleges that they and the appellants, other than Marion Cooter, are the owners of certain described real estate, and sets forth the shares of each of the parties; avers that Marion Cooter has, without right, held possession thereof, “and, by reason of his possession and other means, has cast a cloud over plaintiffs’ and defendants’ title, and that they are entitled to, their proportionate share of the same.” The prayer is that partition may be made and the title quieted.

In setting out the shares alleged to be owned by the parties-respectively, Cooter’s name is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ulrich v. DrischellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Adams v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ragsdale v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API