Legal Opinion
Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 29, 1929No. 3999, 4170PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
These two appeals grow out of the same subject-matter, and were presented together in this court. For convenience’ sake they are disposed of in one opinion.
In No. 4170 appellant on November 11, 1926, filed its bill of complaint for injunction and damages in the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois charging that the appellee has copied both the essential and nonessential features of its unpatented combined Maytag electric power washing and wringing machine, so that purchasing parties do not distinguish appellee’s machine from that of appellant; that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Mirror Polishing & Plating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Automotive Equipment v. Trico Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Besser Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.