Legal Opinion

Mirault v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 20, 2004No. AC 23986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The petitioner, David Mirault, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the respondent commissioner of correction correctly applied the petitioner’s credit for presentence confinement in calculating his discharge date, and that the court thereby violated the equal protection rights afforded him under the federal and state constitutions, and (2) ordered that the amount of presentence confinement credit earned on a fifteen year sentence be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Payton v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Valle v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Valle v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Saintval v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API