Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Rizzone

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2219 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

The pivotal question in this zoning appeal is whether a structure added to a residential lot constitutes a “private garage” permitted by the ordinance as an accessory use and as an exemption from maximum lot coverage requirements, where the ground level of the structure provides for the parking of two motor vehicles but its higher level consists of a business office not disclosed at the time of the permit application.

The appellant landowners are Mr. and Mrs. Biz-zone, who have appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County which affirmed a decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkintown Towing Service v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Kovacs v. Ross Township Board of AdjustmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Beebe v. Media Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Garnick v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bellosi Et Ux. v. Zhb, Clifton HbCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. D'Amato v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Three Rivers Aluminum Co. v. BrodmerkleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Bellosi Et Ux. v. Zhb, Clifton HbCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API