Legal Opinion
D'Amato v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 8, 1991No. 180 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The City of Philadelphia (City) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in this zoning case regarding a variance from an open area requirement. The common pleas court took no evidence, but reversed the decision of the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board), and the City appealed. 1 We reverse the trial court’s order and reinstate the decision of the Board denying the requested zoning variance.
The facts found by the Board are summarized as follows. The property which is the subject of this request for a zoning variance is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ottaviano v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- King v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of NazarethCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In re Appeal of RizzoneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Constantino v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lantos v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Herrit v. Code Management Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- T.M. Dunn and L.N. Dunn v. Middletown Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Chacona v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.