Langham v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The individual plaintiffs are teachers working for various Boards of Education throughout New York State who belong to unions affiliated with plaintiff New York State United Teachers (NYSUT). The school districts in which the teachers are employed participated in the State Health Insurance Plan pursuant to Civil Service Law § 163. Under this plan, two workers in the same family employed by the participating public employer could each obtain family coverage in the plan. In a memorandum issued by the Department of Civil Service, participating employers were informed that, as a result of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- De Milio v. BorghardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- MATTER OF QUEENSBOROUGH CMTY. COLL. OF THE CITY UNIV. OF NEW YORK v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lenihan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seils v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Owners Committee on Electric Rates, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Bliss v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- DiMiero v. Livingston-Steuben-Wyoming County Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Egan v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.