Legal Opinion
Lenihan v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1982PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The reclassification plan must be said to have become fully operative when, on May 11,1979, the directive implementing the earlier personnel resolution was officially promulgated. The plan made clear, among other things, that, as of this date, the new title of warden had come into existence, the title of supervising warden was eliminated from the competitive class, advancement opportunities were significantly altered and no new promotional examinations would be ordered for the four consolidated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Griffin v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by29 opinions
- New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. McBarnetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Owners Committee on Electric Rates, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Solomon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Matter of School Administrators Association of New York State v. New York State Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Rosenthal v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.