Egan v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered October 22, 1993 in Albany County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (hereinafter Niagara Mohawk) and defendant New York Telephone Com*851pany (hereinafter NY Telephone) maintain various jointly owned utility poles on the right-of-way of State Route 7 in the Town of Rotterdam, Schenectady County. In 1990, the State Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT) contracted for the improvement and upgrading of various portions of Route 7 which included, inter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Village of Westbury v. Department of TransportationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Public Service Commission v. Rochester Telephone Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Abrams v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aubin v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Cahill v. HarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ionescu v. BarbuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Smith v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Smith v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.