Chorman v. Foamex International, Inc. (In re Foamex International, Inc.)

OPINION

KEVIN GROSS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Thomas Chorman (“Plaintiff’ or “Chorman”) (D.I. 53) (the “Amended Complaint”), the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Raymond Mabus, Jr. (“Mabus”) and Gregory Christian (“Christian”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) (D.I. 90 and 91) (the “Motion”), the Response in Opposition to the Motion filed by Plaintiff (D.I. 97) (the “Response”), and Defendants’ Reply thereto (D.I. 103). The Court conducted oral argument on December 10, 2012. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that…