Legal Opinion
Caldarola v. Calabrese
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 31, 2002No. Docket No. 01-9053PublishedCited by 255 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal by defendant-appellant Lieutenant Christopher Cala-brese (Calabrese) requires us to address the intersecting legal themes of qualified immunity and the use of informants to support probable cause to arrest. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, McMahon, /., denied Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff-appellant Rocco Cal-darola’s (Caldarola) claim for false arrest. The district court concluded that it could not determine the reliability of the private investigation firms on whose reports…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by255 opinions
- Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sylvia Panetta v. Thomas M. Crowley, Marc Jurnove, Patricia A. Kelvasa, John Doe I, Docket No. 02-7275-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Caldarola v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Harris v. Provident Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Curry v. City Of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.