Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Cabell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 26, 1883PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal of John J. Osborne to decree of chancery court of the city of Richmond, rendered against him on 14th June, 1879, in a chancery suit therein pending, wherein Henry O. Oabell was plaintiff, and Francis J. Barnes, Edward D. Hitchcock and the said John J. Osborne were defendants. The facts of the case and the object of the suit are fully indicated in the syllabus and stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHinton, J.

The appellee, Henry O. Cabell, on the 30th day of April, 1860, borrowed from James Lyons, special commissioner in the suit of Vaughan and als. v. Goddin and als., then depending in the circuit court of the city of Richmond, the sum of $2,853.08, and executed his bond to said Lyons, commissioner, in the proper penalty, with William Daniel, Jr., as surety, and conditioned for the payment of the principal sum and interest in such time and *464in such manner as said court should direct; and at the same time he also conveyed, hy deed, in which his wife united, a certain lot of land in the city of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunning v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Duke of Cumberland v. CodringtonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  3. Daniel v. LeitchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1856

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Moore v. TriplettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  4. Baber v. . HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Tatum v. BallardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API