Legal Opinion
Gary v. Braddock Cemetery
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 5, 2008No. 06-3469, 06-3617, 06-3680PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
This matter involves two consolidated appeals. In No. 06-3469, Karl E. Gary, and other owners of burial plots in Braddock Cemetery (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), appeal the district court’s dismissal of the action they brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Braddock Cemetery, Con-sol Energy, and Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company (collectively, “Defendants”). The district court dismissed that suit after concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feld-man doctrine. In No. 06-3617, Consol Energy and Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Linda McCormick v. Eric A. Braverman Citizens Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- In Re Schaefer Salt Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Ario v. Underwriting Members of Syndicate 53 at LloydsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Kaul v. ChristieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Ekwunife v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.