Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Investment & Improvement Co. v. Schouweiler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Multnomah.: "William N. Gatens, Judge. The Metropolitan Investment & Improvement Company, a corporation, brought this suit against M. E. Schouweiler and T. M. Hurlburt, sheriff of Multnomah County. From a decree dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and decree entered in accordance with the prayer of the complaint. Department 2. Statement by Mu.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah.: "William N. Gatens, Judge. The Metropolitan Investment & Improvement Company, a corporation, brought this suit against M. E. Schouweiler and T. M. Hurlburt, sheriff of Multnomah County. From a decree dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and decree entered in accordance with the prayer of the complaint. Department 2. Statement by Mu. Justice Mc-Camant, This is a suit brought to enjoin the defendants from selling on execution Lot 2 in Block 9 North Albina Addition to the City of Portland. It.appears that this property, prior to May 22, 1914, belonged to one S.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCamant

It is provided by Section 7129, L. O. L., as amended in 1911 that:

“Every conveyance affecting the title of real property within this State hereafter made, which shall not be recorded as provided in this title, shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration of the same real property, or any portion thereof, whose conveyance shall be first duly filed for record.”

The statutes of Oregon on the subject of attachment contain the following provision, Section 301, L. O. L.:

“From the date of the attachment, until it be discharged or the writ executed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. McGarryOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Flegel v. KossOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Barnes v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HickeyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. United States v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Matsuda v. Noble and DecosterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bankers' Discount Corp. v. NoeOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Downing v. GoddardOregon Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API