Legal Opinion

McMahan v. . Spruce Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 24, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff states two causes of action, in the first of which he alleges negligence of the defendant in failing to furnish a safe place to work. The defendant required the plaintiff to work on a lumber dock, which was about twelve feet above the ground on a frame of studding, which had been floored and a steel rail track laid on top of this flooring, upon which track a lumber car or truck was operating. Defendant had been shipping lumber from packs alongside of this dock, and had carelessly piled up a lot of lumber and packing strips in a loose way on top of this lumber dock and by the side of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Causey v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Avery v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. State Ex Rel. Davenport v. McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. GastelumArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Carolina Coach Co. v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Pass v. . Rubber CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Pass v. McClaren Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Bailey v. HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API