Carolina Coach Co. v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.

Plaintiff, appellant, brings forward ten assignments of error, in none of which is prejudicial error made to appear. However we treat them seriatim:

Assignments of error Nos. 1, 2 and 4, based on exceptions of same numbers, are directed to the ruling of the court in sustaining objection by defendants to certain questions asked by counsel for plaintiff relating to cost of operation of buses of plaintiff. The record does not show what the answer of the witness would have been if permitted to answer. Com petency of the testimony is not, therefore, presented by the assignments of error. Barbee v.…