Legal Opinion

Betts v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 8, 1959No. 140-55PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues for disability retired pay to which he claims to be entitled because he was disabled as a result of his service in the Army. There is no controversy as to the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s disability. His right to recover depends upon the answers to other questions which will appear in the course of this discussion.

As an officer in the Army of the United States the plaintiff participated in the campaigns of Europe-Africa-Middle East, Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland and Central Europe in the Second World War. His decorations and awards included the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Eicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Kenneth Wayne Nelson v. Charles K. Miller, Captain, United States Navy, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API