Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Marriott Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1989No. 03601PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dated November 28, 1988, granting appellee-Marriott Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant contends that the court below erred in entering its order. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order below.

On November 1, 1985, appellant filed a complaint against defendants, Marriott Corporation (“Marriott”), 1 and “Quincy’s,” for damages she sustained as a result of a single-car accident. In her complaint appellant alleged that defendants were liable because they violated Pennsylvania’s Dram Shop Act, 47 Pa.S.A. § 4-493, by serving…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Couts v. GhionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Swartley v. HoffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Johnson v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Bridges v. Park Place EntertainmentMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API