Legal Opinion

Hanisch v. Clark

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 1967No. 66-661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellee, Joseph F. Clark, filed a complaint alleging failure to pay a real estate commission pursuant to the terms of an oral contract. A jury verdict of $11,500.00 was entered against the defendant, appellant. This appeal from the final judgment is by the defendants, Jack Hanisch, Barbara Hanisch and Plainview Realty Corp. We reverse upon a holding that the admissible evidence was insufficient to establish liability.

We will attempt to set out the factual allegations fully because of the rule that the appellee is entitled to every reasonable inference that the jury may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'n.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. ROBERTS'FISH FARM v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. Riesen v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American States Ins. Co. v. KelleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Gaye-Joy Corp. v. Crow (In Re Gaye-Joy Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  3. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. BrockmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Bartoszewicz v. Travelers Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API