Legal Opinion
Riesen v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 22, 1943PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.:
The Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, denied a motion to strike certain portions of the bill of complaint and also the motion to dismiss the bill of complaint filed in this case by the Maryland Casualty Company against these two petitioners. Whereupon they brought this order of the chancellor before us for review under Rule 34.
On the 14th day of August 1942, the Maryland Casualty Company, respondent here, brought two suits in the Circuit Court of Dade County, one a common law action against Hubert Riesen, Harley Riesen, and Lawrence Riesen to obtain a judgment in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bay View Estates Corp. v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Hewitt Hewitt v. Punta Gorda State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- George E. Sebring Co. v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Biscayne Realty & Insurance v. Ostend Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- B. L. E. Realty Corp. v. Mary Williams Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. LamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. SykesSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. Hillsborough Holdings Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, Florence Lustig Crossman v. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Marchand v. De Soto Mortgage CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.